Small cities • 2018

Obec Chýně

IČO 00241296

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nová škola Chýně s přilehlou komunikací
Výstavba základních škol
6
Ø5 in industry
Nákup IT vybavení včetně příslušenství
Počítače
2
Ø2 in industry
Výsadba části biokoridoru na parcele č. 898 a 910 v k.ú. Chýně
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
7
Ø4 in industry
OBEC CHÝNĚ - SBĚR, SVOZ A NAKLÁDÁNÍ S ODPADEM
Sběr odpadu
2
Ø2 in industry
Nákup IT vybavení včetně příslušenství
Osobní počítače
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

0%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
PKS stavby a.s.
1 175,096,260
J4W s.r.o.
1 1,312,000
STROMMY COMPANY, s.r.o.
1 789,252
RUMPOLD-P s.r.o.
1 626,865
NWT a.s.
3 555,840
Other suppliers 2 632,260

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 179,012,477
Unregulated purchases -170,652,063
Total 8,360,414

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 2.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (1 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 20% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.40 (average mistakes per contract)