City parts • 2018

Městská část Praha - Čakovice

IČO 00231291

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy a nástavba objektu Dyjská 715, pro ZŠ
Přestavba budov
6
Ø4 in industry
Modernizace gastronomického provozu školní jídelny ZŠ Dr. Edvarda Beneše, Čakovice
Instalace a montáž dveří a oken a souvisejících výrobků
1
Ø6 in industry
Objekt pro sociální bydlení - Schoellerova 11, Třeboradice
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka vzduchotechniky pro školní jídelnu ZŠ Dr. Edvarda Beneše, Praha – Čakovice
Výměníky tepla, klimatizační nebo chladící zařízení a filtrační stroje
5
Ø2 in industry
Systém svozu bioodpadu v MČ Praha - Čakovice
Plošinové a sklápěcí nákladní automobily
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
B & J Holding, a.s.
1 14,012,136
GAMA HOLDING Praha a.s.
1 8,990,000
IM-stav Praha s.r.o.
1 7,599,985
Ondřej - Meissner, spol. s r.o.
1 5,875,590
HAGEMANN a.s.
1 3,420,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 65%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 88%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

56%
average 76%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (1 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 11% (1 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 14% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.57 (average mistakes per contract)