Small cities • 2018

Město Habartov

IČO 00259314

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kanalizace Kluč II. etapa
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace Kluč III. etapa
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Demolice a výstavba nové budovy MŠ Duhová, Habartov
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
STAVEBNÍ ÚPRAVA KOMUNIKACE HORNICKÁ
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Údržba bytového a nebytového fondu města Habartov v letech 2017 - 2021 - opakované vyhlášení
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

56%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
MOBIKO plus a.s.
1 14,398,312
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 10,945,759
bss BÁŇSKÁ STAVEBNÍ SPOLEČNOST s.r.o.
1 7,590,424
STAMOZA, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 5,169,279
BEVAMONT s.r.o.
1 1,159,838
Other suppliers 1 1,099,220

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 58,705,396
Unregulated purchases 181,544,073
Total 240,249,469

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

41%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.38 (average mistakes per contract)