City parts • 2018

Městský obvod Ostrava - Mariánské Hory a Hulváky

IČO 00845451

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

12%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Renovace zdravotechniky v bytovém domě Gen. Hrušky 1216/23 v Ostravě-Mariánských Horách
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
2
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti domů Fráni Šrámka 2435/7, 2436/9 a 2437/11 v Ostravě-Mariánských Horách
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
3
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budov na ulici Fráni Šrámka 2457/28, 2458/30 a 2459/32 v Ostravě-Mariánských Horách
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
2
Ø5 in industry
Sportovní hřiště při ZŠ Gen. Janka, Ostrava – Mariánské Hory
Demolice, příprava staveniště a odklizovací práce
6
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Nivnická, Ostrava – Mariánské Hory
Výstavba silnic
3
Ø8 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

39%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
INTOZA s.r.o.
3 25,016,097
TUBEKO SPORT, spol. s r.o.
1 6,643,116
MDS Ostrava s.r.o.
1 4,999,761
CONE - STAVITELSTVÍ, a.s.
1 4,100,153
ARBOR MORAVIA s.r.o.
1 3,154,456

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 88%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 11% (1 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 38% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.63 (average mistakes per contract)