City parts • 2018

Městský obvod Ostrava - Moravská Ostrava a Přívoz

IČO 00845451

Enough firms are competing for contracts. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

12.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"Rekonstrukce ul. 28. října" (od Masarykova náměstí po Smetanovo náměstí - II)
Různé povrchové práce
6
Ø5 in industry
"Regenerace sídliště Šalamouna - 3. etapa"
Různé povrchové práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení školských zařízení v obvodu MOaP - 3. část, CZ.1.02/3.2.00/13.20570
Stavební úpravy školních budov
12
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace sídliště Šalamouna - 5.B etapa II
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
ZŠO, Gebauerova 8 - výměna oken
Stavební úpravy školních budov
9
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
JANKOSTAV s.r.o.
5 36,597,641
ALPINE Bau CZ a.s.
3 25,103,628
MH - STAVBY, s.r.o.
5 24,127,732
SILNICE.CZ s.r.o.
1 10,228,851
AWT Rekultivace a.s.
2 10,195,374
Other suppliers 21 56,914,601

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

60%
average 65%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rekonstrukce ul. 28. října od Masarykova náměstí po Smetanovo náměstí - II
Additional works
2,371,564
Rekonstrukce ul. 28. října od Masarykova náměstí po Smetanovo náměstí - II
Additional works
1,234,130
ZŠO, Gebauerova 8 - výměna oken
Additional works
963,434
Sládkova 6 - stavební úpravy domu
Additional works
825,480
Regenerace sídliště Fifejdy II – III.etapa
Additional works
575,208

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

81%
average 76%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 41% (13 from 32)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 32)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 32)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 32)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 32)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 32)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 32)
Missing call for tenders 6% (2 from 32)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

19%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 45% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.06 (average mistakes per contract)