City parts • 2018

Městská část Brno-sever

IČO 44992785

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace a výměna výtahů
Výtahy
4
Ø3 in industry
VRANOVSKÁ 17c - REKONSTRUKCE
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Výměna oken v BD Hel. Malířové 4-14 v Brně
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Výměna oken v BD Vaculíkova 1-12 v Brně
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Údržba veřejné zeleně na území městské části Brno-sever
Zahradnické služby
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
KONE, a.s.
2 79,682,000
KOMFORT, a.s.
1 25,200,000
Window Holding a.s.
1 19,043,842
RI OKNA a.s.
1 17,497,293
PET group, a.s.
5 15,857,852
Other suppliers 24 117,341,862

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
"MERHAUTOVA 13 - REKONSTRUKCE - JŘBU 02"
Additional works
9,064,982
"MERHAUTOVA 13 - REKONSTRUKCE - JŘBU 01"
Additional works
2,393,037
"Oprava střechy na BD Cejl 68 v Brně - JŘBÚ"
Additional works
385,736
REALIZAČNÍ PROJEKTOVÁ DOKUMENTACE PRO REKONSTRUKCI POLIKLINIKY LESNÁ, BRNO (dodatečné služby)
Additional works
285,000

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 38)
Final or estimated price not published 16% (6 from 38)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 38)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 38)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 38)
Wrong buyer name 16% (6 from 38)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 38)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 38)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

4%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 33% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.18 (average mistakes per contract)