City parts • 2018

Městská část Brno - Černovice

IČO 44992785

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

20%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace bytových jader Krausova
Stavební úpravy bytových domů a rodinných domů
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce sportovního areálu ZŠ Brno, Kneslova 28 II.
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Úklid bytových domů 2017
Úklidové služby
2
Ø4 in industry
Výměna vstupních dveří do bytů v BD 2017
Okna, dveře a související položky
4
Ø5 in industry
Výměna vstupních dveří do bytů v domech Húskova 6,8,10, Cornovova 49 a Húskova 27
Okna, dveře a související položky
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
MORAVOSTAV Brno, a.s. stavební společnost
1 14,489,721
Hrušecká stavební spol. s r.o.
1 14,489,721
PS BRNO, s.r.o.
1 9,596,217
PROSTAVBY, a.s.
1 7,900,000
MORAVOSTAV Brno, a.s.
2 7,661,793
Other suppliers 7 10,984,610

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

26%
average 88%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

69%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (1 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 31% (4 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

25%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 62% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.46 (average mistakes per contract)