City parts • 2018

Městský obvod Ostrava - Slezská Ostrava

IČO 00845451

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

17.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 42%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
TRIMR s.r.o.
2 12,446,998
VUS Ostrava, s.r.o.
1 10,000,000
JANKOSTAV s.r.o.
1 6,896,999
JOROS s.r.o.
2 6,700,000
HAOSPOL s.r.o.
2 4,241,355
Other suppliers 15 23,898,657

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

65%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (6 from 12)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 12)
Division into lots 17% (2 from 12)
E-auction 0% (0 from 12)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 12)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

67%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Smlouva o sdružených službách dodávky zemního plynu zákazníkovi v kategorii maloodběr pro období od 01.09.2017 do 01.01.2018
Emergency
- 3,200,000
MODERNIZACE VÝUKY NA ZÁKLADNÍCH ŠKOLÁCH MĚSTSKÉHO OBVODU SLEZSKÁ OSTRAVA - ICT vybavení
Previous tender without bids
- 2,973,982

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 65% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.59 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders