Government • 2019

Správa Krkonošského národního parku

IČO 00088455

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The competition for contracts is low.

22.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

22%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce lesních cest - penetrace - 17/2018 - 01 ÚP 35 Pec pod Sněžkou
Obnova povrchu vozovky
1
Ø6 in industry
Uzavření rámcové dohody na provedení revitalizace mokřadů
Demolice a zemní práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Péče o zvěř v mimovegetačním období III. etapa
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
3
Ø5 in industry
Inventarizace a dokumentace krasových jevů v regionu Krkonoš
Vědecké a technické inženýrské služby
1
Ø2 in industry
Inventarizace a dokumentace krasových jevů v regionu Krkonoš
Vědecké a technické inženýrské služby
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Fischer TPD s. r. o.
17 69,498,590
Česká speleologická společnost, základní organizace 5-02 Albeřice
2 30,882,400
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 25,794,872
Forest Constructions s.r.o.
1 25,293,000
Zdeněk Hanuš
13 21,584,068
Other suppliers 589 327,934,191

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

54%
average 43%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (14 from 42)
Nonprice competition 14% (6 from 42)
Division into lots 71% (30 from 42)
E-auction 0% (0 from 42)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 42)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

84%
average 75%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 667,653,782
Small scale tenders 55,584,038
Unregulated purchases 306,631,718
Total 1,029,869,537

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 75%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce lesních cest 2018 - II.
Contract modification
18,932,501 1,634,106 (+9 %)
Těžba a přibližování sortimentů lanovkami na území KRNAP a jeho OP
Contract modification
6,052,700 588,098 (+10 %)
Rekonstrukce lesních cest - penetrace
Contract modification
25,794,872 544,274 (+2 %)
Lesní cesta Nad Alpinou 2
Contract modification
5,218,307 531,002 (+10 %)
Uzavření rámcové dohody na tiskové práce
Contract modification
1,900,000 345,000 (+18 %)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

87%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 5%
Average requirements modifications count 0.62
Average decision length 44.03 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 61)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (3 from 61)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 61)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 61)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 61)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 61)
Missing call for tenders 3% (2 from 61)
Missing winning price 2% (1 from 61)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 8% (5 from 61)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

19%
average 57%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 19% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.32 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 57 tenders under the law)
0-250K 87 tenders
250K-500K 16 tenders
500K-1000K 34 tenders
1000K+ 11 tenders