Government • 2019

Oborová zdravotní pojišťovna zaměstnanců bank, pojišťoven a stavebnictví

IČO 47114321

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer has seriously violated procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 57%
Largest contracts
Výstavba, implementace a technická podpora Integrovaného Centrálního Informačního Systému (ICIS) OZP
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Ø1 in industry
Marketingová komunikace 2015-2017 (II.)
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø1 in industry
Přímořské ozdravné pobyty pro klienty OZP
Recreational, cultural and sporting services
Ø2 in industry
Tiskové a doručovací služby
Printing and related services
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění bezpečnostních a recepčních služeb pro objekty OZP v Praze
Security services
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KOMIX s.r.o.
3 86,849,283
STYRAX, a.s.
2 81,429,440
1 79,458,240
MÉDEA, a.s.
11 76,368,877
MAX Priority Media s.r.o.
2 65,475,885
Other suppliers 23 173,254,753

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 75%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 75%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Technická podpora - IZOP
Authorship rights
- 79,809,600
Technická podpora - licence IBM Informix - II. kolo
Not disclosed
Not disclosed Not disclosed
Technická podpora - licence IBM Informix
Not disclosed
Not disclosed Not disclosed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (2 from 28)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (4 from 28)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 28)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 28)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 28)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 28)
Missing call for tenders 11% (3 from 28)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 28)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 28)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 57%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 25 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 5 tenders