Government • 2019

Národní zemědělské muzeum, s.p.o.

IČO 75075741

Good buyer. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

8.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 57%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Provozně nízkonákladový depozitář Čáslav – Stavba depozitáře
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
6
Ø1 in industry
Depozitárně expoziční objekt NZM v Ostravě - dodavatel stavebních prací
Stavební práce
4
Ø4 in industry
„Realizace stavebních úprav a nástavby „Obnova budovy Národního zemědělského muzea, s.p.o. – pobočky Praha včetně střešní terasy a výtahu “
Stavební práce
6
Ø4 in industry
Poskytování služeb ostrahy a dozoru pro Národní zemědělské muzeum, s. p. o.
Bezpečnostní služby
9
Ø4 in industry
Provozně nízkonákladový depozitář Čáslav II
Demolice a zemní práce
9
Ø9 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
POZEMSTAV Prostějov, a.s.
1 99,477,261
STAMONT - POZEMNÍ STAVITELSTVÍ s.r.o.
1 85,480,000
INDUS PRAHA, spol. s r.o.
1 35,000,000
POLANSKÝ GROUP a.s.
1 30,873,642
AVERS, spol. s r.o.
1 29,047,565
Other suppliers 94 200,149,799

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

37%
average 43%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 17% (3 from 18)
Nonprice competition 15% (3 from 20)
Division into lots 5% (1 from 20)
E-auction 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 75%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 352,432,085
Small scale tenders 51,514,998
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 256,741,645

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 75%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

31%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 35%
Average requirements modifications count 1.95
Average decision length 72.53 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 30)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 30)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 30)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 57%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 79% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 28 tenders under the law)
0-250K 13 tenders
250K-500K 16 tenders
500K-1000K 21 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders