Government • 2019

Ředitelství vodních cest ČR

IČO 67981801

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

3%
average 57%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
8 609,409,249
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
3 262,135,300
STRABAG Rail a.s.
1 199,979,453
SMP CZ, a.s.
1 106,649,738
LABSKÁ, strojní a stavební společnost s.r.o.
2 50,645,519
Other suppliers 47 247,600,293

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

24%
average 43%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 25)
Nonprice competition 64% (16 from 25)
Division into lots 4% (1 from 25)
E-auction 0% (0 from 25)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 25)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 75%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 75%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

65%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.54
Average decision length 51.57 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 37)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 37)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 37)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 37)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 37)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 37)
Missing call for tenders 3% (1 from 37)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 37)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 37)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

29%
average 57%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 79% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.12 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 33 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 9 tenders