Government - small authorities • 2019

Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský

IČO 00020338

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

2.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodávka LC-MS/MS
Chromatografy
1
Ø1 in industry
Dodávka 2 ks maloparcelních sklízecích mlátiček
Zemědělské stroje
1
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka maloparcelní sklízecí mlátičky obilovin
Žací stroje
2
Ø3 in industry
ROZŠÍŘENÍ SPISOVÉ SLUŽBY ICZ E-SPIS O 9 DOPLŇKOVÝCH MODULŮ – 2018
Informační technologie: poradenství, vývoj programového vybavení, internet a podpora
2
Ø1 in industry
Hmotnostně selektivní detektor s příslušenstvím
Hmotnostní spektrometry
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HALDRUP GmbH
4 11,723,193
WATERS Gesellschaft m.b.H., organizační složka
2 11,490,698
Bartoň a Partner s.r.o.
6 7,988,094
Pragolab s.r.o.
3 5,979,600
Přerost a Švorc - auto, s.r.o.
3 5,818,000
Other suppliers 355 146,799,570

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

58%
average 34%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 110,030,607
Small scale tenders 135,399,404
Unregulated purchases 759,645,826
Total 1,005,075,837

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Vážící zařízení s odběrem vzorků - 2 ks
Outside directive scope
- 606,210

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

82%
average 68%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 11% (2 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (3 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 11% (2 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

90%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.53 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 149 tenders
250K-500K 50 tenders
500K-1000K 48 tenders
1000K+ 48 tenders