Government - small authorities • 2019

Národní galerie v Praze

IČO 00023281

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Poskytování bezpečnostních služeb v objektech Národní galerie v Praze
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø1 in industry
Technická správa objektů Národní galerie v Praze
Realitní služby
6
Ø2 in industry
NG, Praha Jinonice - novostavba depozitární budovy, 1. a 2. etapa, Id. č. 134V131000041
Architektonické a související služby
0
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka a instalace nové technologie předávací stanice ve Veletržním paláci II
Výměníky tepla, klimatizační nebo chladící zařízení a filtrační stroje
2
Ø2 in industry
Pojištění uměleckých děl a předmětů
Životní zajištění
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
G4S Secure Solutions (CZ), a.s.
2 63,151,012
SECURITAS ČR s.r.o.
2 44,962,538
KUNSTTRANS PRAHA, spol. s r.o.
6 26,242,815
KART, s.r.o.
1 24,959,796
INDUS PRAHA, spol. s r.o.
1 20,876,684
Other suppliers 213 110,607,659

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

31%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 6% (1 from 18)
Nonprice competition 22% (4 from 18)
Division into lots 6% (1 from 18)
E-auction 0% (0 from 18)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 278,725,170
Small scale tenders 120,161,765
Unregulated purchases 899,310,674
Total 1,298,197,609

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

5%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

65%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 24%
Average requirements modifications count 0.53
Average decision length 74.29 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (7 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 10% (3 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 20% (6 from 30)
Missing winning price 7% (2 from 30)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 3% (1 from 30)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

63%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.71 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 28 tenders under the law)
0-250K 66 tenders
250K-500K 8 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 16 tenders