Government - small authorities • 2019

Uměleckoprůmyslové museum v Praze

IČO 00023442

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 58%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PSG-International a.s.
1 15,392,401
ETNA spol. s r.o.
2 11,687,371
DYTEC, s.r.o.
2 8,045,272
Dřevozpracující výrobní družstvo
2 4,324,000
PSJ, a.s.
1 352,904
Other suppliers 25 1,072,538

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (4 from 14)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 14)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 14)
E-auction 0% (0 from 14)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 14)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 660,347,298
Small scale tenders 912,538
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 595,668,560

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

20%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

54%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.14
Average decision length 48.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 15% (3 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 15% (3 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)
Missing winning price 5% (1 from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

25%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 54% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.23 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 20 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders