Government - small authorities • 2019

Česká geologická služba

IČO 00025798

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

9.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dvoupodlažní hala sklad hmotné dokumentace Lužná u Rakovníka 2
Stavební úpravy skladů a průmyslových budov
1
Ø3 in industry
Dvoupodlažní hala sklad hmotné dokumentace Lužná u Rakovníka
Stavební úpravy skladů a průmyslových budov
0
Ø3 in industry
Hmotnostní spektrometr s termální ionizací z pevné fáze s příslušenstvím (TIMS) - Dodávka, instalace a zaškolení TIMS s příslušenstvím
Hmotnostní spektrometry
2
Ø1 in industry
Pořízení podnikové licence na software Esri
Balík programů pro tvorbu dokumentů, kreslení, tvorbu obrázků, plánování a produktivitu
1
Ø1 in industry
Dodávka hotových pokrmů pro zaměstnance
Pohostinství a ubytovací služby a maloobchodní služby
0
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s.
1 15,189,489
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Praha) s.r.o.
1 10,896,890
ARCDATA PRAHA, s.r.o.
3 10,123,000
HPST, s.r.o.
2 7,995,921
Milan Kavale
1 7,055,000
Other suppliers 155 70,380,948

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

57%
average 34%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 122,247,357
Small scale tenders 61,013,652
Unregulated purchases 835,651,130
Total 1,018,912,139

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 68%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

83%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 81 tenders
250K-500K 26 tenders
500K-1000K 29 tenders
1000K+ 10 tenders