Government - small authorities • 2019

Valašské muzeum v přírodě v Rožnově pod Radhoštěm

IČO 00098604

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Obnova objektu národní kulturní památky areál Pustevny objekt Libušína s restauračním provozem a bytem správce
Stavební práce
5
Ø4 in industry
Jak jde kroj, tak se stroj
Organizace výstav, veletrhů a kongresů
3
Ø3 in industry
Konstrukční úpravy stávající ocelové konstrukce a její nové osazení na pozemek, zpevněná příjezdová komunikace a oplocení
Stavební práce
2
Ø3 in industry
Konstrukční úpravy stávající ocelové konstrukce a její nové osazení na pozemek, zpevněná příjezdová komunikace a oplocení
Stavební práce
0
Ø3 in industry
Kultúrne dedičstvo Javorníkov a Beskýd v rámci programu Interreg V-A Slovenská republika – Česká republika
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ARCHATT, s.r.o.
1 65,823,140
Art Consultancy s.r.o.
1 12,770,731
RADEKOV spol. s r.o.
2 8,671,644
JURÁŇ s.r.o.
1 3,561,010
MEGASTRO CZ, s.r.o.
1 3,093,300
Other suppliers 9 11,475,039

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

85%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 131,263,877
Small scale tenders 8,775,787
Unregulated purchases 54,701,452
Total 194,741,116

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Konstrukční úpravy stávající ocelové konstrukce a její nové osazení na pozemek, zpevněná příjezdová komunikace a oplocení
Not disclosed
Not disclosed Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 8% (1 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

20%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.08 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 3 tenders
1000K+ 4 tenders