Government - small authorities • 2019

Městský soud v Praze

IČO 00215660

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is low.

13.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
MS Praha – navýšení kapacity, SLEZSKÁ – STAVBA
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými nebo pohotovostními službami
2
Ø5 in industry
MS Praha – dislokace OS Praha 5, HYBERNSKÁ - STAVBA
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými nebo pohotovostními službami
4
Ø5 in industry
MS Praha – modernizace CSMS II. fáze
Různé služby pro podniky
1
Ø2 in industry
MS Praha – nástavba dvorního traktu, SPÁLENÁ_STAVBA
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø1 in industry
MS Praha - modernizace CSMS
Různé služby pro podniky
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PKS Praha a.s.
2 72,945,934
ProLIST, s.r.o.
2 48,994,300
Auböck s.r.o.
1 44,536,849
TREPART s.r.o.
1 21,685,485
CERGOMONT s.r.o.
1 11,444,444
Other suppliers 131 54,348,005

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 33% (2 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

54%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 277,866,938
Small scale tenders 34,843,988
Unregulated purchases 757,648,045
Total 1,070,358,971

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
MS Praha – dislokace OS Praha 5, HYBERNSKÁ - STAVBA
Contract modification
44,536,849 6,603,788 (+15 %)
MS Praha – navýšení kapacity, SLEZSKÁ – STAVBA
Contract modification
46,995,524 4,687,863 (+10 %)
MS Praha – navýšení kapacity, SLEZSKÁ – PD, AD, BOZP a IČ
Contract modification
2,120,000 498,526 (+24 %)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40
Average decision length 53.80 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 9% (1 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

79%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 72 tenders
250K-500K 16 tenders
500K-1000K 3 tenders
1000K+ 14 tenders