Government - small authorities • 2019

Národní úřad pro kybernetickou a informační bezpečnost

IČO 05800226

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Technologie ochrany síťového perimentru
Síťová zařízení
1
Ø2 in industry
Odborné vzdělávání zaměstnanců NÚKIB v oblasti kybernetické bezpečnosti
Školení
0
Ø1 in industry
Stavební úpravy prostorů budovy Celj 10, Brno
Stavební práce
4
Ø3 in industry
Koncová klientská zařízení – rámcová dohoda
Osobní počítače
1
Ø2 in industry
Servery 2018 - doplnění
Servery
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Dimension Data Czech Republic s.r.o.
2 26,421,490
AutoCont CZ a.s.
2 10,736,445
QDS Group a.s.
1 8,988,353
Everesta, s.r.o.
5 4,500,000
GOPAS, a.s.
3 4,491,728
Other suppliers 9 12,448,313

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

60%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (2 from 7)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 8)
Division into lots 38% (3 from 8)
E-auction 0% (0 from 8)
Innovative procedure 12% (1 from 8)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rámcová dohoda na „Odborné vzdělávání zaměstnanců NÚKIB v oblasti kybernetické bezpečnosti“
Previous tender without bids , Technical exclusivity
- 441,728

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

66%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75
Average decision length 57.57 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (6 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

17%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 60% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.33 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders