Government - small authorities • 2019

Státní veterinární ústav Jihlava

IČO 13691554

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy objektu stájové budovy veterinární nemocnice v areálu SVÚ Jihlava
Stavební práce
5
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření serverového HW a SW, zavedení virtualizace pracovních stanic, sjednocení ověřování uživatelů
Servery
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce laboratoří BSE na SVÚ Jihlava a zateplení objektu
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
3
Ø1 in industry
ICP-MS s trojitým kvadrupólem
Laboratorní, optické a přesné přístroje a zařízení (mimo skel)
1
Ø1 in industry
Poskytování dopravní služby při svozu vzorků k vyšetření – svozová trasa č. 3 a svozová trasa č. 4 - Poskytování dopravní služby při svozu vzorků k vyšetření – svozová trasa č. 4
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STARKON a.s.
2 16,327,052
O.K.SERVIS BioPro, s.r.o.
7 10,236,890
CYMEDICA, a.s.
4 7,700,000
HPST, s.r.o.
3 7,632,937
Data Protection Delivery Center, s.r.o.
1 6,267,200
Other suppliers 89 62,662,009

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Division into lots 60% (3 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

44%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 48,953,803
Small scale tenders 56,899,995
Unregulated purchases 435,579,263
Total 541,433,061

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

89%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.10 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 39 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 19 tenders
1000K+ 21 tenders