Government - small authorities • 2019

Státní úřad pro jadernou bezpečnost

IČO 48136069

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

37%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Telekomunikační služby
Telekomunikační služby
1
Ø2 in industry
SÚJB - Správa nemovitosti - Poskytování úklidových služeb, služeb technické správy budov a služeb souvisejících s údržbou zeleně
Úklidové služby
1
Ø3 in industry
Obnova Sítě včasného zjištění Radiační monitorovací sítě ČR
Laboratorní, optické a přesné přístroje a zařízení (mimo skel)
2
Ø1 in industry
SÚJB - Správa nemovitosti - Poskytování služeb ostrahy a provoz recepce
Bezpečnostní služby
2
Ø4 in industry
Servis SW prostředků ESTE
Help desk a podpůrné služby
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodafone Czech Republic a.s.
1 24,042,012
ZENOVA services s.r.o.
2 22,301,333
ENVINET a.s.
2 20,973,000
ABmerit, spoločnosť s ručením obmedzeným
2 13,501,000
S&T CZ s.r.o.
9 12,398,555
Other suppliers 167 79,461,911

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

35%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (2 from 11)
Nonprice competition 8% (1 from 12)
Division into lots 8% (1 from 12)
E-auction 0% (0 from 12)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 12)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Úpravy SW prostředků ESTE
Technical exclusivity
- 3,873,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50
Average decision length 55.45 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (6 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 7% (1 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

79%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 64 tenders
250K-500K 7 tenders
500K-1000K 11 tenders
1000K+ 18 tenders