Government - small authorities • 2019

Česká centrála cestovního ruchu - CzechTourism

IČO 49277600

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 58%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

64%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Rapid, akciová společnost
16 57,404,953
Magnas Media s.r.o.
5 31,952,225
GFK Czech s.r.o.
2 19,885,000
Target Pictures Production s.r.o.
2 12,872,700
MARK/BBDO,a.s.
1 12,508,090
Other suppliers 90 63,871,561

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 13% (3 from 23)
Nonprice competition 74% (17 from 23)
Division into lots 17% (4 from 23)
E-auction 0% (0 from 23)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 23)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 512,437,539
Small scale tenders 30,174,505
Unregulated purchases 1,988,464,245
Total 2,531,076,289

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

49%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 22%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.39
Average decision length 63.27 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

74%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 34)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (3 from 34)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 34)
Missing supplier ID 18% (6 from 34)
Missing buyer ID 15% (5 from 34)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 34)
Missing call for tenders 29% (10 from 34)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 34)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 34)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

14%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 46% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 3 tenders
1000K+ 12 tenders