Government - small authorities • 2019

Nejvyšší kontrolní úřad

IČO 49370227

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

21.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Generální projektant stavby sídla Nejvyššího kontrolního úřadu
Architektonické a související služby
6
Ø3 in industry
PS - 2015, tiskový systém
Balíky programů a informační systémy
4
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka mobilních pracovních stanic
Přenosné počítače
3
Ø3 in industry
Správce stavby sídla Nejvyššího kontrolního úřadu
Poradenské inženýrství a stavební služby
2
Ø3 in industry
MOKO - 2015, mobilní komunikace
Telekomunikační služby
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ALWIL Trade, spol. s r.o.
10 49,733,431
Masák & Partner, s.r.o.
1 34,485,000
PM6 s.r.o.
1 12,126,650
O2 Czech Republic a.s.
1 9,153,339
Simac Technik ČR, a.s.
5 7,815,052
Other suppliers 141 70,862,963

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 30% (3 from 10)
Nonprice competition 50% (5 from 10)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 10)
E-auction 10% (1 from 10)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 10)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
FORM - 2016, dodávka a implementace řešení pro tvorbu elektronických formulářů a workflow v prostředí MS Sharepoint
Contract modification
2,550,815 945,000 (+37 %)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 38%
Average requirements modifications count 1.25
Average decision length 68.63 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.44 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law)
0-250K 47 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 30 tenders
1000K+ 19 tenders