Government - small authorities • 2019

Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže

IČO 65349423

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Informační systém pro zefektivnění vedení správních řízení
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø1 in industry
Kompletní rekonstrukce areálu Českomalínská 588/14, Praha - detašované pracoviště ÚOHS
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
2
Ø4 in industry
Ostraha a úklid sídla Úřadu pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže a péče o zeleň na období 2016 až 2020
Bezpečnostní služby
5
Ø4 in industry
Servisní kontroly a opravy automobilů značky ŠKODA a servis pneumatik automobilů vozového parku Úřadu pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže v letech 2017 až 2019
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
3
Ø1 in industry
Zajištění komplexního servisu, údržby a oprav silnoproudých systémů budov Úřadu pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže v období 2016 - 2019 (OPAKOVANÉ VYHLÁŠENÍ)
Opravy a údržba technických stavebních zařízení
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AutoCont CZ a.s.
1 28,950,000
STAVEKO, spol. s r.o.
1 20,949,132
PRVNÍ CHRÁNĚNÁ DÍLNA s.r.o.
1 12,362,362
Autocentrum ROS, a.s.
1 1,663,296
EBM TZB, s.r.o.
1 1,631,370
Other suppliers 12 10,061,934

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 9% (1 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 18% (2 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

26%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.70 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 2 tenders