Government - small authorities • 2019

Hasičský záchranný sbor hlavního města Prahy

IČO 70886288

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

10.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

88%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba HS HOLEŠOVICE, Argentinská 149 Praha 7 II.
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
7
Ø1 in industry
Nákup automobilového žebříku AZ40
Hasičská vozidla
1
Ø1 in industry
FZŠ-Technický automobil TA S3
Hasičská vozidla
2
Ø1 in industry
Projekt PEGAS
Vysílací přístroje pro radiotelefonii, radiotelegrafii, rozhlasové a televizní vysílání
1
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka kontejnerů ochrany obyvatelstva
Přepravní zařízení a pomocné výrobky pro přepravu
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Gardenline s. r. o.
1 285,385,663
Pramacom Prague spol. s r.o.
11 22,276,536
FIREFIGHTING TECHNOLOGY INT. s.r.o.
1 16,114,000
SINTEX, a.s.
29 9,434,620
VOCHOC, s.r.o.
11 8,157,181
Other suppliers 211 105,369,252

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 34%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 130,609,999
Small scale tenders 99,292,775
Unregulated purchases 678,348,567
Total 908,251,341

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup RDST systému PEGAS a příslušenství
Outside directive scope
- 3,611,600

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 10%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0.60
Average decision length 45.13 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (1 from 24)
Final or estimated price not published 46% (11 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 8% (2 from 24)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 24)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 24)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

77%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.71 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 102 tenders
250K-500K 37 tenders
500K-1000K 41 tenders
1000K+ 31 tenders