Government - small authorities • 2019

Hasičský záchranný sbor Ústeckého kraje

IČO 70886300

Good buyer. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

10.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
PS Ústí nad Labem - hala pro uskladnění techniky
Stavební úpravy skladů a průmyslových budov
4
Ø3 in industry
Fond zábrany škod – Technické automobily - chemický/olejový
Pohotovostní vozidla
0
Ø1 in industry
Fond zábrany škod - Cisternová automobilová stříkačka - technická
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
1
Ø2 in industry
FZŠ - Technické automobily CH/O
Hasičská vozidla
4
Ø1 in industry
PS Ústí nad Labem – hala pro uskladnění techniky č. 2
Stavební úpravy skladů a průmyslových budov
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
INSKY spol. s r.o.
2 16,709,708
WISS CZECH, s.r.o.
3 13,082,000
Dräger Safety s.r.o.
6 8,353,838
KOBIT, spol. s r.o.
2 7,816,000
UNIPETROL RPA, s.r.o.
5 6,931,383
Other suppliers 286 72,526,962

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (2 from 7)
Nonprice competition 57% (4 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

51%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 95,794,017
Small scale tenders 64,711,850
Unregulated purchases 463,000,875
Total 623,506,742

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0.20
Average decision length 22.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 56% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.44 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 94 tenders
250K-500K 27 tenders
500K-1000K 30 tenders
1000K+ 18 tenders