Government - small authorities • 2019

Centrum služeb pro silniční dopravu

IČO 70898219

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

17.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Motivační předměty BESIP
Tiskařské výrobky a související produkty
0
Ø2 in industry
Známky STK a SME - Známky STK
Tiskařské výrobky a související produkty
4
Ø2 in industry
Známky STK a SME - Známky SME
Tiskařské výrobky a související produkty
0
Ø2 in industry
Dodávka 16 ks vozidel kategorie N1 s úpravou na mobilní kancelář
Motorová vozidla pro zvláštní účely
2
Ø1 in industry
Ochranné nálepky SME
Tiskařské výrobky a související produkty
5
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KASICO, a.s.
2 53,000,000
TISK CENTRUM s.r.o.
1 40,000,000
M 3000, a.s.
1 20,436,738
BRUDRA s.r.o.
1 12,000,000
SPEED PRESS Plus a.s.
4 8,579,900
Other suppliers 47 69,265,580

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

42%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 9% (2 from 23)
Nonprice competition 30% (7 from 23)
Division into lots 13% (3 from 23)
E-auction 0% (0 from 23)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 23)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 230,120,544
Small scale tenders 41,037,965
Unregulated purchases 399,855,080
Total 671,013,588

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.68
Average decision length 65.45 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 26)
Final or estimated price not published 15% (4 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing supplier ID 4% (1 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 12% (3 from 26)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 26)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 26)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 26)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

47%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.22 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 11 tenders
1000K+ 16 tenders