Government - small authorities • 2019

Národní hřebčín Kladruby nad Labem

IČO 72048972

Good buyer. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

5.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Realizace provozně stravovacího objektu
Stavební práce
4
Ø4 in industry
Obnova objektu č. p. 3 Kladruby nad Labem
Stavební práce
1
Ø3 in industry
Rámcová dohoda na dodávky pohonných hmot do vlastních úložišť
Nafta
0
Ø3 in industry
Parkoviště v areálu Národního hřebčína Kladruby nad Labem
Výstavba parkovišť
1
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace historické stodoly ve dvoře Františkov v Selmicích
Bytová výstavba
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

89%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PRVNÍ STAVEBNÍ CHRUDIM a.s.
4 38,234,078
EKOSTAVBY JABŮREK s.r.o.
2 22,118,930
TANNACO, a.s.
1 13,956,666
Stavrecon Pardubice s.r.o.
2 7,441,497
VIKTORSTAV s.r.o.
1 6,734,699
Other suppliers 148 116,127,335

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 34%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (16 from 32)
Nonprice competition 38% (12 from 32)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 32)
E-auction 0% (0 from 32)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 32)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

76%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 382,610,101
Small scale tenders 64,648,767
Unregulated purchases 327,930,623
Total 775,189,492

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Obnova objektu č. p. 3 Kladruby nad Labem
Contract modification
17,785,724 2,968,779 (+17 %)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

81%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29
Average decision length 49.24 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 41)
Final or estimated price not published 22% (9 from 41)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 41)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 41)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 41)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 41)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 41)
Missing winning price 2% (1 from 41)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 41)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

76%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 38 tenders under the law)
0-250K 24 tenders
250K-500K 51 tenders
500K-1000K 26 tenders
1000K+ 18 tenders