Government - small authorities • 2019

Správa základních registrů

IČO 72054506

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Poskytování služeb podpory provozu interní infrastruktury a interních systémů SZR
Výpočetní podpora a poradenské služby
5
Ø1 in industry
Vybudování DC2 – dodávka HW
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø1 in industry
Zajištění podpory CA service desk a nástrojů pro monitoring a dohled nad provozem systémů provozovaných SZR
Výpočetní podpora a poradenské služby
1
Ø1 in industry
Smlouva o poskytování služeb datového centra
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø1 in industry
Smlouva o poskytování služeb národního datového centra
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STORAGE ONE, a.s.
2 98,546,504
ICZ a.s.
1 84,952,600
Česká pošta, s.p.
2 64,639,374
GORDIC spol. s r.o.
1 46,176,000
AUTOCONT a.s.
2 39,499,800
Other suppliers 16 88,442,445

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

55%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zajištění technologických prostor a služeb datového centra pro kritické informační systémy základních registrů
Technical exclusivity
- 34,135,013

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 50% (10 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 10% (2 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 5% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.95 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 8 tenders