Government - small authorities • 2019

Záchranný útvar Hasičského záchranného sboru ČR

IČO 75152304

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 58%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění výcviku řidičů složek IZS
Vzdělávání a školení
1
Ø1 in industry
Cisternové zodolněné stříkačky 8x8
Hasičská vozidla
2
Ø1 in industry
Automobil těžký vyprošťovací terénní 8x8
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø1 in industry
Zodolněné velitelsko průzkumné vozidlo
Hasičská vozidla
1
Ø1 in industry
Cisternové vozidlo velkoobjemové
Hasičská vozidla
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 85%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
THT Polička, s.r.o.
4 48,735,110
KAR group, a.s.
3 17,067,000
ČKD Mobilní Jeřáby a.s.
4 16,735,000
EXCALIBUR ARMY spol. s r.o.
5 16,220,746
CENTRUM MORAVA AUTO, s.r.o.
3 16,143,413
Other suppliers 139 104,858,666

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 34%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

76%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Pásový nakladač - zodolněný
Technical exclusivity
- 14,870,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

93%
average 68%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

90%
average 92%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Final or estimated price not published 48% (10 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

97%
average 65%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.05 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 64 tenders
250K-500K 32 tenders
500K-1000K 26 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders