State-owned enterprises • 2015

Diamo, státní podnik

IČO 00002739

Good buyer. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

3.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Likvidace povrchových areálů po hlubinné těžbě uranu - DIAMO s.p., o.z. TÚU Stráž pod Ralskem
Demolice a zemní práce
3
Ø4 in industry
Likvidace povrchových areálů po hlubinné těžbě uranu - DIAMO s.p., o.z. TÚU Stráž pod Ralskem
Demolice a zemní práce
3
Ø4 in industry
Sanace území ohroženého skládkou nebezpečného odpadu v Pozďátkách
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Likvidace CHÚ Stráž pod Ralskem
Demolice a zemní práce
4
Ø4 in industry
Likvidace CHÚ Stráž pod Ralskem
Demolice a zemní práce
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s.
2 992,908,852
Syner, s.r.o.
4 914,516,769
Smp Cz, a.s.
2 521,391,763
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
2 326,278,064
Rwe Energie, s.r.o.
1 197,900,000
Other suppliers 227 1,943,386,361

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

80%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 17% (13 from 77)
Nonprice competition 27% (21 from 77)
Lots 25% (19 from 77)
E-auction 5% (4 from 77)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 5,475,955,409
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 5,475,955,409

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

56%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 0.32

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 243)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (28 from 243)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 243)
Missing supplier ID 4% (9 from 243)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 243)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 243)
Call and award notices contradict each other 1% (2 from 243)
Missing call for tenders 5% (12 from 243)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

61%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.96 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 243)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 243)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (3 from 243)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 243)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (1 from 243)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (14 from 243)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (33 from 243)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.