KRAJ • 2016

Královéhradecký kraj

IČO 70889546

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 69%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Rozšíření průmyslové zóny Vrchlabí - jih, regionální infrastruktura – II/293 a II/295 Studenec, pošta - Dolní Branná“
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
6
Ø6 in industry
Rozšíření průmyslové zóny Vrchlabí - jih, regionální infrastruktura – I/14 Vrchlabí, Nerudova – Nádražní
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
9
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce historické budovy bývalého Ústavu hluchoněmých
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy Galerie moderního umění
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
II/501 Svatojánský Újezd - Choteč - Lužany - Špice
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
7
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 90%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
12 153,250,927
Colas Cz, a.s.
12 142,456,237
M - Silnice a.s.
12 133,910,875
Strabag a.s.
10 131,774,009
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
4 124,866,791
Other suppliers 277 1,841,779,039

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

69%
average 76%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 39% (56 from 145)
Nonprice competition 35% (51 from 145)
Lots 5% (7 from 145)
E-auction 1% (2 from 145)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 76%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 2,535,135,046
Unregulated purchases 1,955,865,113
Total 4,491,000,158

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

61%
average 69%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

66%
average 62%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 16%
Average requirements modifications count 1.09

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (1 from 327)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (47 from 327)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 327)
Missing supplier ID 4% (12 from 327)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 327)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 327)
Call and award notices contradict each other 1% (3 from 327)
Missing call for tenders 3% (9 from 327)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (1 from 327)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (7 from 327)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (2 from 327)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 327)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 327)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (23 from 327)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (25 from 327)