Government • 2015

Národní ústav pro vzdělávání, školské poradenské zařízení a zařízení pro další vzdělávání pedagogických pracovníků

IČO 00022179

Good buyer. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

2.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„NÁVRH A IMPLEMENTACE INFORMAČNÍHO SYSTÉMU PRO KVALIFIKACE A AUTORIZACI (ISKA)“
Informační systémy
7
Ø1 in industry
„UNIV 3 - ZAJIŠTĚNÍ VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ PRŮVODCŮ A HODNOTITELŮ“
Vzdělávání dospělých a jiné vzdělávání
2
Ø2 in industry
„KONCEPT – ZAJIŠTĚNÍ KONCEPČNÍHO ŘEŠENÍ V OBLASTI PODPORY VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ ZAMĚSTNANCŮ MALÝCH A STŘEDNÍCH PODNIKŮ “
Poradenství v oblasti řízení lidských zdrojů
2
Ø3 in industry
„UNIV 3 - ZAJIŠTĚNÍ INOVACE INFORMAČNÍHO SYSTÉMU UNIV“
Komunikační infrastruktura
2
Ø4 in industry
„UNIV 2 KRAJE - ZAJIŠTĚNÍ INFORMAČNÍ PODPORY DALŠÍHO VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ“
Komunikační infrastruktura
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Aquasoft spol. s r.o.
1 18,415,000
Pragodata Consulting, s.r.o.
2 14,321,000
Veryvision s.r.o.
1 7,949,380
Eufc Cz s.r.o.
1 7,920,000
B & J Holding,a.s.
2 7,067,196
Other suppliers 22 49,847,631

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

56%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 136,284,814
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 303,339,830
Total 439,624,643

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„NÚV – REKONSTRUKCE BUDOVY- DODATEČNÉ STAVEBNÍ PRÁCE„
Not disclosed
- 533,873

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 12%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.35

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

65%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 30)
Procedure type not published 3% (1 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 10% (3 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 30)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 30)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 30)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

57%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.21 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 30)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 30)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 40% (12 from 30)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.