Small cities • 2016

Město Kaplice

IČO 00245941

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti areálu ZŠ Školní, Kaplice
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti areálu ZŠ Fantova, Kaplice
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti Polikliniky Kaplice
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti Kulturního domu Kaplice
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místní komunikace Široká a SNP v Kaplici
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
9
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

40%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Faspro s.r.o.
4 50,329,199
Tangenta, spol. s r.o.
3 25,591,828
K - Building Cb, a.s.
1 7,867,091
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 5,337,498
Daňhel Agro a.s.
1 2,634,508
Other suppliers 2 2,827,735

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

46%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.57

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (3 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 17% (2 from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 42% (5 from 12)