Government • 2015

Krajské ředitelství policie Pardubického kraje

IČO 72050250

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

29.
ranking
67%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební práce - realizace úspor energie - Policie ČR Pardubice, Na Spravedlnosti 2516
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými službami
9
Ø14 in industry
Strukturovaná kabeláž a elektroinstalace pro VT - 2. etapa
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými nebo pohotovostními službami
5
Ø6 in industry
Zajištění stavební připravenosti IOS KŘP Pardubického kraje
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými nebo pohotovostními službami
8
Ø6 in industry
Strukturovaná kabeláž a elektroinstalace pro VT - 3. etapa
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými nebo pohotovostními službami
5
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce skladů KŘP Pardubického kraje
Stavební úpravy objektů používaných pořádkovými nebo pohotovostními službami
10
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Ag Com, a.s.
5 29,061,567
B & J Holding,a.s.
1 17,918,126
Az Stavební Heřmanův Městec s.r.o.
3 8,671,761
Rudolf Kmoch, spol. s r.o.
3 4,828,142
Marhold a.s.
1 4,296,130
Other suppliers 23 26,858,585

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

77%
average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

45%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 91,634,316
Unregulated purchases 363,134,237
Total 454,768,553

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

90%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

65%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

47%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (2 from 36)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 36)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 36)
Missing supplier ID 14% (5 from 36)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 36)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 36)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 36)
Missing call for tenders 28% (10 from 36)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

72%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.39 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 3% (1 from 36)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 36)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 36)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 36)
Supplier bankruptcy 8% (3 from 36)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (2 from 36)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (8 from 36)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.