State-owned enterprises • 2015

Pražská informační služba

IČO 00064491

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Online marketingová kampaň Prahy na sociálních sítích a internetu na období 36 měsíců
Reklamní a marketingové služby
2
Ø3 in industry
Výběr komunikační agentury pro online marketingovou kampaň Prahy na sociálních sítích a internetu v letech 2014 - 2016
Reklamní a marketingové služby
7
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění služeb souvisejících s podporou kongresové turistiky na období 36 měsíců
Reklamní a marketingové služby
1
Ø3 in industry
Nákup reklamní plochy a polep plochy dopravního letounu
Reklamní a marketingové služby
2
Ø3 in industry
Informační kiosky Pražské informační služby
Informační panely
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

54%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mediacom Praha s.r.o.
1 41,490,074
Havas Worldwide Prague a.s.
1 7,677,248
Dynamo design s.r.o.
2 5,435,000
Prague Convention Bureau, o.s.
1 4,998,950
České aerolinie a.s.
1 4,900,000
Other suppliers 7 20,986,940

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

76%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 86,328,212
Unregulated purchases 62,834,632
Total 149,162,844

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Havarijní oprava zdi - Ctěnice
Krajní naléhavost
1,708,656

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.14

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (1 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 23% (3 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

15%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 15% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.17 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (1 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (2 from 13)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.