State-owned enterprises • 2015

Pražská informační služba

IČO 00064491

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 52%
Largest contracts
Online marketingová kampaň Prahy na sociálních sítích a internetu na období 36 měsíců
Reklamní a marketingové služby
Ø3 in industry
Výběr komunikační agentury pro online marketingovou kampaň Prahy na sociálních sítích a internetu v letech 2014 - 2016
Reklamní a marketingové služby
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění služeb souvisejících s podporou kongresové turistiky na období 36 měsíců
Reklamní a marketingové služby
Ø3 in industry
Nákup reklamní plochy a polep plochy dopravního letounu
Reklamní a marketingové služby
Ø3 in industry
Informační kiosky Pražské informační služby
Informační panely
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mediacom Praha s.r.o.
1 41,490,074
Havas Worldwide Prague a.s.
1 7,677,248
Dynamo design s.r.o.
2 5,435,000
Prague Convention Bureau, o.s.
1 4,998,950
České aerolinie a.s.
1 4,900,000
Other suppliers 7 20,986,940

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 86,328,212
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 62,834,632
Total 149,162,844

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 73%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Havarijní oprava zdi - Ctěnice
Krajní naléhavost
- 1,708,656

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 29%
Average requirements modifications count 0.14

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (1 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 23% (3 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 15% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.17 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (1 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (2 from 13)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.