Small cities • 2016

Město Týn nad Vltavou

IČO 00245585

Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Modernizace městské letní plovárny v Týně nad Vltavou
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace expozic městského muzea v Týně nad Vltavou
Výstavní zařízení
2
Ø2 in industry
Týn nad Vltavou: Zateplení městské polikliniky - II. etapa - op. ř.
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba páteřní komunikace v kasárnách Týn nad Vltavou - II. etapa
Výstavba silnic
7
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení městské polikliniky - II. etapa
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ohl Žs, a.s.
1 54,895,000
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
2 16,188,862
" M plus " spol. s r.o.
1 12,884,187
Metrostav a.s.
1 11,778,212
Edikt a.s.
1 11,075,162
Other suppliers 11 36,439,418

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (2 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 17)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 17)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (1 from 17)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (1 from 17)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (1 from 17)