Government • 2015

Zařízení služeb pro Ministerstvo vnitra

IČO 67779999

Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Ozdravné pobyty formou lázeňské péče
Lázeňské služby
4
Ø3 in industry
Dodávky náhradních dílů pro osobní vozidla značky Škoda, VW a AUDI
Náhradní díly pro vozidla pro přepravu zboží, pro dodávky a automobily
2
Ø3 in industry
Nákup stravovacích šeků
Stravenky
2
Ø3 in industry
Ozdravné pobyty formou lázeňské péče
Lázeňské služby
4
Ø3 in industry
Smluvní zajištění systémové a aplikační podpory platformy Lotus Domino Notes ZSMV a podpora Active Directory
Služby programového vybavení
1
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

79%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Apm Automotive s.r.o.
3 70,193,734
Škoda Auto a.s.
1 63,998,965
Lázně Velichovky a. s.
1 25,111,994
Porsche Česká republika s.r.o.
2 24,638,012
Priessnitzovy léčebné lázně a.s.
1 20,627,996
Other suppliers 30 123,992,290

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 12% (1 from 8)
Division into lots 88% (7 from 8)
E-auction 12% (1 from 8)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 8)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

49%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 332,485,155
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,039,840,231
Total 1,372,325,386

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 61%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

35%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 19%
Cancelled contracts 37%
Average requirements modifications count 0.15

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

50%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 38)
Final or estimated price not published 16% (6 from 38)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 38)
Missing supplier ID 5% (2 from 38)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 38)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 38)
Missing call for tenders 21% (8 from 38)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 38)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 38)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.78 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 38)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 38)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 38)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 38)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (1 from 38)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 38)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (5 from 38)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.