Small cities • 2016

Město Kuřim

IČO 00281964

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kuřim - odkanalizování ul. Hybešova
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizačních sítí
11
Ø5 in industry
Bezbariérové zpřístupnění podchodu železniční stanice Kuřim ze severní části města
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Zhotovitel projektové dokumentace stavby „Společenské a kulturní centrum v Kuřimi“
Architektonické, technické a plánovací služby
2
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ul. Bezručova čtvrť a ul. Na Zahrádkách v Kuřimi
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
10
Ø5 in industry
II/385 KUŘIM PRŮTAH
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Aquasys spol. s r.o.
1 13,793,000
Habau Cz s.r.o.
1 9,752,353
Privileg, spol. s r.o.
4 7,374,790
Archteam Projektová Kancelář s.r.o.
1 7,200,000
Topstav s.r.o.
1 6,998,883
Other suppliers 12 29,785,171

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

49%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

47%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 38%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (1 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 15% (3 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 20)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (2 from 20)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 20)
Supplier donating to political party 15% (3 from 20)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 10% (2 from 20)