State-owned enterprises • 2015

Ostravské komunikace, a.s.

IČO 25396544

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Víceúčelová vozidla pro silniční údržbu
Vozidla silniční údržby
1
Ø2 in industry
Přístavba a nástavba objektu C - dispečinku v areálu OK, a.s.
Stavební práce na průmyslových budovách
6
Ø3 in industry
Vozidla pro silniční údržbu
Vozidla silniční údržby
2
Ø2 in industry
Souvislá údržba místní komunikace ul. Horní
Obnova povrchu vozovky
11
Ø5 in industry
Nákup asfaltu
Produkty odvozené z ropy a z uhlí
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Croy s.r.o.
4 40,909,970
Bohemia Asfalt, s.r.o.
3 34,022,930
Firesta-fišer, rekonstrukce, stavby a.s.
2 32,818,016
Zogal Union s.r.o.
2 20,275,000
Strabag a.s.
1 9,785,146
Other suppliers 15 51,512,475

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

82%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 7)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 7)
Lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 29% (2 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

50%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 189,323,539
Unregulated purchases 573,518,601
Total 762,842,140

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

75%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Nákup asfaltu
Krajní naléhavost, Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
13,089,850

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 8%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

44%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 27)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 27)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 63% (17 from 27)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

23%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 30% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.02 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 4% (1 from 27)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (2 from 27)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 26% (7 from 27)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.