State-owned enterprises • 2015

Palivový kombinát Ústí, státní podnik

IČO 00007536

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

17.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

81%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

6%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mnd Drilling & Services a.s.
3 1,654,028,193
Garnets Consulting a.s.
1 62,409,000
Rekultivační Výstavba Most, a.s.
6 30,028,610
Centropol Energy, a.s.
16 27,280,577
Rem plus s.r.o.
2 15,473,820
Other suppliers 37 105,296,701

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 24% (6 from 25)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 25)
Lots 24% (6 from 25)
E-auction 0% (0 from 25)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

97%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,920,422,013
Unregulated purchases 107,366,987
Total 2,027,789,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 73%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.10

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 65)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 65)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 65)
Missing supplier ID 6% (4 from 65)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 65)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 65)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 65)
Missing call for tenders 6% (4 from 65)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

48%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.45 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 65)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 65)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (2 from 65)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 65)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 65)
Supplier donating to political party 2% (1 from 65)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 23% (15 from 65)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.