Government • 2015

Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí

IČO 00551023

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Správa lokální ICT infrastruktury
Péče o počítačové zařízení
4
Ø1 in industry
Centrální dodávka elektrické energie pro Českou republiku – Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí a jím řízené organizace
Elektrická energie
3
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění rozvoje komunikační a systémové infrastruktury MPSV_II.
Služby informačních technologií
1
Ø1 in industry
ZAJIŠTĚNÍ KOMUNIKAČNÍCH AKTIVIT OP LZZ A ESF
Marketingové služby
4
Ø3 in industry
SYSTEMIZACE rezortu Ministerstva práce a sociálních věcí České republiky
Poradenství v oblasti řízení lidských zdrojů
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Intelek spol. s r.o.
1 112,000,000
Hewlett-packard s.r.o.
3 73,523,400
Pražská energetika, a.s.
1 72,840,506
Anect a.s.
1 69,091,353
Ogilvy & Mather spol. s r.o.
1 64,488,510
Other suppliers 163 806,469,139

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

81%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 61% (31 from 51)
Nonprice competition 29% (15 from 51)
Lots 61% (31 from 51)
E-auction 6% (3 from 51)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,250,294,691
Unregulated purchases 4,382,519,134
Total 5,632,813,825

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

22%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 16%
Average requirements modifications count 1.22

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

51%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (8 from 170)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (15 from 170)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 170)
Missing supplier ID 3% (5 from 170)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 170)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 170)
Call and award notices contradict each other 5% (8 from 170)
Missing call for tenders 2% (4 from 170)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 170)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 170)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 4% (6 from 170)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 170)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 170)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 170)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (22 from 170)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.