Small cities • 2016

Město Vimperk

IČO 00250805

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Stavební úpravy školních budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk- části díla opce II.
Stavební úpravy školních budov
Not disclosed
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Stavební úpravy školních budov
Not disclosed
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Stavební úpravy školních budov
1
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk - část díla opce
Stavební úpravy školních budov
Not disclosed
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

19%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Salvete spol. s r.o.
7 181,881,564
Aldast, spol. s r.o.
1 28,569,222
Strabag a.s.
2 10,905,840
Kvint Vlachovo Březí spol. s r.o.
1 5,326,862
Topkarmoto s.r.o.
1 4,449,000
Other suppliers 10 13,752,877

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 25% (1 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

2%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk- části díla opce II.
Not disclosed
- 30,095,243
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Not disclosed
- 29,557,199
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Not disclosed
- 29,391,851
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk - část díla opce
Not disclosed
- 29,291,165
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Not disclosed
- 29,273,220

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 18% (4 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (2 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 14% (3 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 22)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

61%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 22)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (1 from 22)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier bankruptcy 9% (2 from 22)
Supplier donating to political party 5% (1 from 22)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 32% (7 from 22)