Small cities • 2016

Město Vimperk

IČO 00250805

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Stavební úpravy školních budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk- části díla opce II.
Stavební úpravy školních budov
neuveden
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Stavební úpravy školních budov
neuveden
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Stavební úpravy školních budov
1
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk - část díla opce
Stavební úpravy školních budov
neuveden
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

19%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Salvete spol. s r.o.
7 181,881,564
Aldast, spol. s r.o.
1 28,569,222
Strabag a.s.
2 10,905,840
Kvint Vlachovo Březí spol. s r.o.
1 5,326,862
Topkarmoto s.r.o.
1 4,449,000
Other suppliers 10 13,752,877

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 25% (1 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

2%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk- části díla opce II.
Not disclosed
30,095,243
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Not disclosed
29,557,199
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Not disclosed
29,391,851
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk - část díla opce
Not disclosed
29,291,165
Zateplení ZŠ Vimperk
Not disclosed
29,273,220

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 18% (4 from 22)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (2 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing supplier ID 5% (1 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 22)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 14% (3 from 22)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

61%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 22)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (1 from 22)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 22)
Supplier bankruptcy 9% (2 from 22)
Supplier donating to political party 5% (1 from 22)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 32% (7 from 22)