Government • 2015

Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví

IČO 00023841

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

43.
ranking
65%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Centrum akademických a vzdělávacích služeb a.s.
1 7,300,000
Centrum andragogiky, s.r.o.
1 5,404,410
První Chráněná Dílna s.r.o.
1 3,261,178
Darothore a.s.
1 2,782,800
Phdr. Miroslav Dobeš
2 2,000,000
Other suppliers 15 7,207,325

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

32%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 37,096,769
Unregulated purchases 325,338,865
Total 362,435,634

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Poskytování služeb dodavatele vzdělávacích služeb kurzu „Poskytnutí neodkladné nemocniční péče (ATLS)“
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
800,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

0%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 21)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 10% (2 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

21%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 25% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 21)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 5% (1 from 21)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.