Government • 2015

Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví

IČO 00023841

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

43.
ranking
65%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Centrum akademických a vzdělávacích služeb a.s.
1 7,300,000
Centrum andragogiky, s.r.o.
1 5,404,410
První Chráněná Dílna s.r.o.
1 3,261,178
Darothore a.s.
1 2,782,800
Phdr. Miroslav Dobeš
2 2,000,000
Other suppliers 15 7,207,325

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 0)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 0)
E-auction 0% (0 from 0)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 0)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

32%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 37,096,769
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 325,338,865
Total 362,435,634

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Poskytování služeb dodavatele vzdělávacích služeb kurzu „Poskytnutí neodkladné nemocniční péče (ATLS)“
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 800,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

0%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 10% (2 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

21%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 25% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 21)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 21)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 5% (1 from 21)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.