State-owned enterprises • 2015

Technické služby Zlín, s.r.o.

IČO 60711086

Good buyer. Court found serious misconduct. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

7.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
III. etapa skládky Suchý důl 5. stavba a Rekultivace III. etapy skládky Suchý důl, 3. stavba
Výstavba skládek odpadů
11
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka speciálního stroje pro hutnění odpadu na skládce - kompaktoru
Různá strojní zařízení pro všeobecné účely a speciální strojní zařízení
4
Ø2 in industry
Nádoby na biologický odpad o objemu 240 litrů
Kontejnery a nádoby na odpad a odpadky
2
Ø3 in industry
Velkokap. vozidlo 3osé pro svoz směsného komunálního a objemného odpadu včetně vážícího systému
Vozidla pro sběr odpadků
2
Ø3 in industry
Velkokapacitní vozidlo 3osé pro svoz směsného komunálního a objemného odpadu včetně vážícího systému
Vozidla pro sběr odpadků
4
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

74%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Skanska a.s.
1 9,883,635
A-tec servis s.r.o.
2 9,640,000
Awp s.r.o.
1 7,492,000
Elkoplast Cz, s.r.o.
1 5,472,500
Euro Sol s.r.o.
1 4,259,500
Other suppliers 5 11,825,407

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

57%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 48,573,043
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 103,220,768
Total 151,793,811

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 73%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.36

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 9% (1 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (2 from 11)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.