Government • 2015

Česká školní inspekce

IČO 00638994

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

7.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

86%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vývoj interaktivního prostředí pro tvorbu, modifikaci a hodnocení ŠVP, implementaci metodik hodnocení a platformy pro vzdělávání
Vývoj programového vybavení pro oblast vzdělávání
3
Ø1 in industry
Zajištění zasedacích místností a občerstvení pro pořádání seminářů v rámci ČR
Pohostinství a ubytovací služby a maloobchodní služby
6
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění služeb správy, provozu a uživatelské podpory všech informačních systémů projektu
Podpora programového vybavení
2
Ø1 in industry
Upgrade a doplnění HW a SW serverové platformy ČŠI
Informační systémy a servery
3
Ø2 in industry
ČŠI Praha - Obnova autoparku 2013 II
Osobní vozidla
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
itelligence, a.s.
3 43,048,800
Caleum a.s.
3 13,712,150
Nh Car, s.r.o.
3 11,662,650
Vodní zdroje Ekomonitor spol. s r.o.
1 8,771,731
Stavby Fišer s.r.o.
2 4,868,512
Other suppliers 5 9,416,831

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 91,480,675
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 228,853,603
Total 320,334,278

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

80%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
ČŠI Praha - Obnova autoparku 2013 II
Not disclosed
- 4,886,950

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 54%
Average requirements modifications count 0.13

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 12% (2 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (1 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 35% (6 from 17)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 17)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

42%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 69% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.55 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 12% (2 from 17)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 17)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (2 from 17)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.