State-owned enterprises • 2015

Technické sítě Brno, akciová společnost

IČO 25512285

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Provádění obnovy veřejného osvětlení ve statutárním městě Brně
Instalace a montáž zařízení pro osvětlení silnic
6
Ø4 in industry
Rámcová smlouva na dodávku materiálu
Sloupy pouličního osvětlení
2
Ø3 in industry
Zhotovení jednotlivých stupňů projektových dokumentací obnovy jednotlivých částí VO Statutárního města Brna
Technické projektování
7
Ø3 in industry
Sanace primárního kolektoru v úseku TG0- Š1- I.ETAPA
Stavební úpravy tunelů, šachet a podchodů
3
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce části úseku Svitavské nábřeží mezi šachtami š6a - š24
Stavební úpravy tunelů, šachet a podchodů
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

54%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Imos Brno, a.s.
3 103,091,451
Elektro S.m.s., spol. s r.o.
2 37,315,901
Dopravoprojekt Brno a.s.
1 20,000,000
Unicab, s.r.o.
2 11,000,000
Inženýrské stavby Brno, spol. s r.o.
1 7,474,706
Other suppliers 14 39,394,031

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

26%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 218,276,091
Unregulated purchases 3,076,847,909
Total 3,295,124,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 73%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
SERVISNÍ SMLOUVA
Not disclosed
333,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.10

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Final or estimated price not published 4% (1 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 23)
Call and award notices contradict each other 4% (1 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 23)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

13%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 18% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.22 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 23)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 23)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 39% (9 from 23)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.