State-owned enterprises • 2015

Tepvos, spol. s r.o.

IČO 25945793

Good buyer. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

7.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Ústí nad Orlicí - kanalizace a ČOV
Stavební práce na výstavbě čistíren odpadních vod
6
Ø5 in industry
Nákup energií pro společnost Tepvos, spol. s r.o., město Ústí nad Orlicí a jím založené a zřízené organizace
Zemní plyn
3
Ø3 in industry
Zákaznické a školící centrum TEPVOS, Ústí nad Orlicí
Rekonstrukce budov
5
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka systému městské karty pro město Ústí nad Orlicí
Čtecí zařízení pro magnetické karty
2
Ø2 in industry
Pořízení samosběrného zametacího stroje
Zametací vozy
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

3%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Smp Cz, a.s.
1 594,294,524
Pragoplyn, a.s.
1 23,839,673
Matex Hk s.r.o.
1 12,472,214
V-elektra, a.s.
1 7,430,723
Ivar a.s.
1 6,842,375
Other suppliers 4 5,213,397

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

84%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 731,447,278
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 731,447,278

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

62%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 22% (2 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 11% (1 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 11% (1 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 22% (2 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

66%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 87% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.94 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (1 from 9)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

75%
average 29%

Full disclosure

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.