Government • 2015

Armádní Servisní, příspěvková organizace

IČO 60460580

Good buyer. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

17.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

82%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Centralizovaný nákup elektrické energie na rok 2015
Elektrická energie
5
Ø4 in industry
Úklidové a pokojské služby, recepční služby a venkovní úklidy v zařízeních AS-PO
Úklidové služby
5
Ø8 in industry
Zateplení objektu internátu A1 – Vyškov, Víta Nejedlého
Stavební práce
16
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení objektu internátu - Brno, Tučkova 23
Stavební práce
19
Ø5 in industry
Přáslavice - plynofikace a decentralizace kotelen
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
2 177,853,403
E.on Energie, a.s.
3 168,234,345
Pragoplyn, a.s.
9 163,341,965
Ep Energy Trading, a.s.
7 142,888,206
Expol Hk, s.r.o.
6 58,926,389
Other suppliers 98 658,112,515

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (6 from 30)
Nonprice competition 3% (1 from 30)
Lots 57% (17 from 30)
E-auction 0% (0 from 30)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

79%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,378,330,522
Unregulated purchases 841,865,605
Total 2,220,196,126

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

92%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 9%
Cancelled contracts 30%
Average requirements modifications count 0.71

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

38%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 125)
Final or estimated price not published 28% (35 from 125)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 125)
Missing supplier ID 3% (4 from 125)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 125)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 125)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 125)
Missing call for tenders 4% (5 from 125)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

54%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 78% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.26 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

93%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 1% (1 from 125)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 125)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 1% (1 from 125)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 125)
Supplier bankruptcy 1% (1 from 125)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (4 from 125)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (15 from 125)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.