State-owned enterprises • 2015

Vodovody a kanalizace Kroměříž, a.s.

IČO 49451871

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a rozšíření úpravny vody v aglomeraci Kroměříž
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
4
Ø4 in industry
„Výstavba kanalizace a výtlaku OV z Bezměrova na ČOV Postoupky“
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Úvěr na rekonstrukci a rozšíření úpravny vody v aglomeraci Kroměříž
Poskytování úvěrů
3
Ø2 in industry
„Oprava kanalizační stoky Tř. Legií – Bystřice pod Hostýnem“
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
„Přístavba komory vodojemu Prusinovice“
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

16%
average 62%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Imos group s.r.o.
5 149,637,846
Smo a.s.
2 25,875,161
Československá obchodní banka, a. s.
1 8,000,000
Vhs Brno, a.s.
1 4,485,993
Arte spol.s r.o
1 3,499,500
Other suppliers 4 5,321,041

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Inovativni 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 67%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 196,819,541
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 220,425,459
Total 417,245,000

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 73%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 76%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 27% (4 from 15)
Final or estimated price not published 87% (13 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing supplier ID 20% (3 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 13% (2 from 15)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 15)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

18%
average 36%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 20% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

62%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 15)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 15)
Supplier donating to political party 47% (7 from 15)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (2 from 15)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 29%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.